“I have seen the tsunami of chronic disease around me and I have felt the impact of its force.“

I was honoured to speak with Joanna Hewson on Thursday night, on behalf of the Vibrancy Project ‘A Healthy Happy You’ for Jean Hailes Women’s Health Week 2016.

I loved being part of the night, weaving Dr. Jean Hailes story into my message, highlighting the importance of advocacy in Women’s Health, questioning ‘Am I Normal’, and explaining my concept of the ‘Balance of Life’.

The evening created a safe space to share stories of women’s health and hear from a diverse panel of women in our community, and included Naomi Walsh. Tameeka Lynch, Tenille Pentland, Sophie Skipper, Anita Brunacci, Jo and I, as we answered questions from the panel chair and from the audience.

The Tasmanian Minister for Health, Michael Ferguson, was there with his wife Julie. To me that showed great leadership and a real commitment for Women’s Health in our community and to the Healthy Tasmania 2025 plan.

As I looked around the audience I was proud to see some of the Nutrition for Life team, a few special friends and familiar faces, but I was also excited to see so many women I didn’t know. Women who had come because they wanted to be part of this amazing event.

I loved having Gary in the audience, hearing me speak publicly for the first time as the previous times I have spoken were at women only events.

 

I was proud to expose ‘the elephant in the room’ and will continue to be a passionate and LOUD advocate for Women’s Health in Tasmania

Here is my 20 minute talk if you are interested;

“Hello – my name is Belinda Fettke.

I apologise, but I will have to use notes for my talk tonight.

There are 2 major hurdles to going ‘freestyle’ without them. The first hurdle is that I am an Aquarian and my family will assure you that I can talk and talk… even underwater! The second is to point out that the byline to my photography business, BPhotography, is ‘The Art of Storytelling’. So, if you want to hear from anyone else tonight, I need a structured framework or my stories could go on all night 

The theme for this year’s Jean Hailes Women’s Health Week is “AM I NORMAL?” This question intrigued me and I must admit, this isn’t the first time I have asked this of myself!

“Am I Normal?” to be so passionate about something I believe in, that my purpose in life, my mission, blurs the lines of Work/Life balance?

The more I think about this question, the more I think that I am.

But this does not mean that my version of ‘normal’ is anyone else’s idea of normal.

For me…
Normal is making time for family, who will always be my priority.
But, it is also accepting that I am a passionate advocate of women’s (and men’s) health.

I have to say I am, and have been, a huge supporter of the Jean Hailes Foundation and I wear my Pink Elephant pin tonight, with pride. <3

I love what Women’s Health Week stands for and when Sarah Yates and Ari Powell, cofounders of the Vibrancy Project, asked me to share my story with you tonight, I was honoured. I also can’t wait to hear from the women who will be joining me on the panel, shortly. They truly inspire me!

I would like to start tonight by sharing the story of Dr. Jean Hailes because it aligns with my story. She too, was a passionate and VOCAL advocate of women’s health.

It wasn’t only in my nursing many years ago, or through my work at Nutrition for Life now, but as a wife, a mother, a daughter and a friend. In fact, even as a photographer I have seen what chronic illness does to people and the strain that it puts on families.

When you see first hand how devastating ‘sickness’ can be, you can never unsee it …

I would like to share this quote with you “If a woman is in good health, her family, her community and society around her, also benefit” Dr. Jean Hailes.

Dr. Dorothy Jean Hailes began her career in a centre for intellectually disabled children in 1950. Through her work in this area she came to realise the importance of a mothers’ good health for the wellbeing of her family, especially a family with a disabled child. Over time she became more and more interested in women’s health.

Moving into general practice, Jean was disbelieving of her colleagues’ neglect of the so-called ‘minor symptoms’ that many ageing women complained of. Minor symptoms that were barely acknowledged and women had endured in silence from one generation to the next.

Jean set out to make it her mission to address the gap of the health needs of menopausal women. She spent time in America and on her return; Jean sought to extend the control women had gained over their fertility, since the introduction of the birth control pill, with the acceptance of hormone replacement therapy in the management of menopause symptoms.

Despite her thoughtful advocacy for women’s health and her ability to deconstruct the MYTHS surrounding the topic, there was a lot of resistance within the male dominated medical community of the 1950’s and 60’s.

Jean became skilled in raising public awareness and was the first doctor to use the social media platform of the time – Talk Back radio – to her advantage. She also spoke to community groups whenever the opportunity arose.

A professor at Prince Henry’s Hospital finally supported her cause and Jean Hailes opened the first Women’s Health Clinic in 1971. She received such an incredibly positive response from women in her community that by 1976 a second clinic had opened at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Sydney.

The Jean Hailes Foundation for Women’s Health was founded in 1992, four years after Dr. Jean Hailes passed away from cancer, at the age of 62.

And while the messenger might be silent now … her strong advocacy and compassionate messages of health touch each one of us in this room tonight.

Inspired by so many brave stories like this, my mind doesn’t stop thinking of ways that I can promote Women’s Health. Tonight is the perfect opportunity to quote the mission of the Jean Hailes Foundation and ‘expose the elephant in the room’. This national campaign is all about opening up conversations on Women’s Health that impact each and every one of us at some time in our lives.

Over the week there have been 5 different focuses’ – Am I normal?, body image, healthy weight, mental health, and I am sure this would have been closest to Jean Hailes heart – healthy sex.

For me, exposing the elephant in the room during Women’s Health Week is opening up the conversation about nutrition and the link to chronic disease, asking that we consider “Food as Medicine” … Because, there is no doubt in my mind that what we eat affects our health, whether we want to admit it or not!

I have seen the tsunami of chronic disease around me and I have felt the impact of its force.

Changing the way we eat can make a difference. I have seen it in my family, I have seen it with friends and I hear so many stories in our community.

You see… ‘Sick care’ doesn’t just drain our health resources; it drains our community; it impacts workplaces; it impacts families, and it impacts individuals.

Sick care also impacts healthcare workers.

How can we possibly change that?

Well, I am proud to be supporting the Tasmanian Healthy 2025 plan. I have been one of many voices contributing to the government’s consultation draft earlier this year and I attended the panel discussion at the University of Tasmania (UTAS), chaired by Dr. Norman Swan, last week.

It is about making healthcare a priority in Tasmania.

When we started Nutrition for Life in 2014 as an allied healthcare centre, we offered clinical appointments in a clinical setting. It was about helping people in our community to take back control of their health with personalised nutrition advice.

Within a very short time, the team understood that in order to make effective changes, people needed their families to support them; they needed their workplaces to support them; and they needed the community to support them to help achieve the best health outcomes.

Our team continued to develop resources to use in small group sessions and create fun and interactive workshops for workplaces. As we got busier, we understood a need to make sure the health and wellbeing of our team became our priority.

Sarah, our business manager, encouraged us to become involved with Work Skills Tasmania and we began attending seminars and breakfast meetings supporting the health and wellbeing of Tasmanian employees. Through the Employer of Choice Awards process we met valuable and supportive mentors in the health and well-being space and continued to reach out to businesses that were aligned with ours. I can’t recommend this networking opportunity highly enough and encourage other allied healthcare businesses to become involved.

Which brings me back to my original question… Am I Normal?

‘Am I Normal’ to be so passionate about something I believe in, that my purpose in life, my mission, blurs the lines of Work/Life Balance.

I have loved taking on a leadership role at Nutrition for Life. I have read widely and been mentored as I have mentioned, but it was at a recent breakfast meeting in Hobart that my real ‘AHA’ moment was realised.

I was attending a Tas Skills conference in Hobart, as part of the Tasmanian Employer of Choice Awards, and sat there mesmerized as Nic Stephen (Forte Consulting) challenged us to consider ’work’ as part of our ‘life-balance’ rather than as a separate part of our identity.

I have to admit – It fitted me like a glove!

I have such a strong mission and purpose in my life, and in acknowledging and allowing work to become part of my Life Balance, I have taken away the guilt I think many of us here may feel as working mums.

The concept of work becoming part of my Life Balance gives me permission to prioritise. It allows me to enjoy my work and not see it as a chore or as a negative experience.

And it makes me question … when did Life Balance break into separate parts?

I think school is the perfect example of pre the whole Work/Life Balance theory.

School students are encouraged to blur the lines of the start and finish of their school day with homework being the best example. They may choose to take on more work in more senior years, be a part of the school band, a musical or play, involved in extra curricular sporting activities, volunteer and/or attend social functions. Most camps are compulsory.

Over the years it is up to each individual as to how involved they get and how much of their life gets taken up by ‘School’.

I would like you to take a moment to consider this…

Why is it that learning is considered ‘life’ and work isn’t?

It is also important to acknowledge that Life Balance evolves. Life Balance at 10 is very different to that at 20, 30, ….. 52 and 70. And that’s the amazing thing! Each individual can put a different emphasis on THEIR interpretation of their LIFE BALANCE.

I believe Women’s Health is about prioritising a healthy lifestyle and finding a balance that includes health eating, physical activity, sleep and laughter. Unfortunately, many women juggle work and a busy family life and often ignore their own health needs until it is too late.

If we don’t start valuing Preventative Healthcare as individuals, how can we possibly expect our family, our community or our government to?

I am a passionate and vocal advocate for Women’s Health and I will continue to strive for a Life Balance that allows me to become the best version of ‘Normal’ I can be.

Thank you.

#wecantwait

Continue reading

Tony’s results are in! ‘A former Type 2 diabetic’ is how he now describes himself :-)

Tony has dropped 22kgs in 10 weeks!
Tony’s blood glucose levels are consistently in the 4’s now!
Tony has come off 4 medications! (under GP supervision)
Tony has lost his knee arthritis pain!
Tony wakes up earlier every morning and bounces out of bed with more energy!
Tony is ‘buzzing’ with his new life!
Tony’s HbA1c has come back to normal!
Tony’s blood lipid profile has converted from a high cardiac risk to ‘normal’ despite healthy fats in his diet!

Tony Benneworth has reversed his Type 2 diabetes!

https://au.news.yahoo.com/…/the-saving-australia-diet-fin…/…

Thank you Tony for listening to Gary and working with the team at Nutrition for Life.

Thank you Dr Paul Hanson for ‘volunteering’ Tony when Gary was looking for a volunteer.

Thank you Pete Evans, PJ Madam and the Sunday Night crew for believing in this.

What this showed is that lifestyle change can make a difference….. and LCHF – Low Carb Healthy Fat, was easy to do. This way of eating is sustainable and Tony will keep at it.

You are a Tassie legend Tony Benneworth, former diabetic!!!!

www.nutritionforlife.healthcare

Co founded by Belinda and Gary Fettke to help empower people to take back control of their health.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/sunday-night/features/a/32517949/the-saving-australia-diet-final-check-up/#page1

https://www.facebook.com/belindanofructose/posts/1109348762492907

Diabetes educator Diane Webb and Tony Benneworth, who has newfound energy. Picture: CHRIS KIDD

http://www.themercury.com.au/lifestyle/benneworth-swears-by-homegrown-eating-plan/news-story/b2cae02032a584fcba341bf9a77df8c2

http://www.examiner.com.au/story/4140940/benneworth-praises-fettkes-diet-advice/

Can Tony’s outcome justify ‘doctors’ advising low carb options for diabetes management?

Tonight’s the night. Channel 7’s Sunday Night ‘Saving Australia Diet’ finale is on tonight.

Tony worked with Gary and the team at Nutrition for Life for individualised care over a 10 week period, supervised by his GP, Dr Paul Hanson.

Did Tony lose weight?
Did Tony get control of his blood glucose level?
Did Tony reduce his medications?
Did Tony improve his knee arthritis pain?
Does Tony have more energy?
Did Tony have fun?
Does Tony still have Type 2 Diabetes?

All will hopefully be answered tonight.

“Diabetes is the inability of a person to control the blood glucose as a result of how much glucose and carbohydrate they’ve eaten.”

Pretty simple really. Cut back on the processed food and replace it with healthy ones. No crime in that.

www.nutritionforlife.healthcare

Co founded by Belinda and Gary Fettke to help empower people to take back control of their health.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/sunday-night/features/a/31538041/the-saving-australia-diet/#page1

https://www.facebook.com/belindanofructose/posts/1108945525866564

 

“It is the glycaemic response to, not the carbohydrate content of food that matters in diabetes and obesity.”

indexCongratulations to Dr David Unwin who has won the British National Health Service (NHS) Leadership Recognition Award for being the NHS Innovator of the year for delivering real improvements in health and well being for both individuals and communities.

He has been, and continues to promote the benefits of a low carbohydrate management in his patients with Type 2 diabetes.

David is a General Practitioner and a man that I really admire for challenging the science and empowering people to take back control of their health.

“Science evolves by being challenged. Not by being followed.” @thegaryscience

David’s advice is saving not only his patients health and pocket but also the government tens of thousands of dollars each year, just in his practice alone.

“Dr Unwin has described how, as a committed, informed GP, he has been able to help patients with type 2 diabetes to lose weight and gain control over the blood sugar with a low carb diet – at the same time saving £20,000 per year in prescription costs – an important factor bearing in mind that Diabetes UK has recently warned that type 2 diabetes will bankrupt the NHS.” – Jane Feinmann.

His latest paper was published Friday.

http://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/8

http://healthinsightuk.org/…/time-for-diabetes-uk-to-unplu…/

https://www.facebook.com/belindanofructose/posts/1096171350477315

My new role as Administrator

Image may contain: text

As the new admin for the No Fructose page, I just have to remind everyone that I have absolutely no qualifications to discuss or recommend specific nutrition advice or manage health problems – Belinda Fettke.

I will be posting articles that I find educational, supportive and challenging with a nutrition and health focus. I am looking forward to providing resources that allow people to question what processed foods we consume in our western diet, and help make decisions on their health.

My first post is a wonderful article on Low-Carb Diets and Diabetes, published in the August Issue of Today’s Dietitian. Special thanks to Franziska Spritzler, RD, CDE for sharing this with me. It is a topic very close to Gary’s heart.

“In a critical review of the literature, Feinman and 25 other doctors and researchers present 12 points of evidence supporting the use of low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach to treating type 2 diabetes and as the most effective adjunct to pharmacology in type 1 diabetes. “We had 26 authors because we wanted to include experts who had [practical] experience using the diet, scientists who understood the basis of the diet, and medical researchers who understood the diet and supported it as a great treatment,” says Feinman, who was lead author of the review. The following summarizes the 12 points of evidence presented by the reviewers:

• Hyperglycemia is the most salient feature of diabetes. Dietary carbohydrate restriction has the greatest effect on decreasing blood glucose levels.
• During the epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes, caloric increases have been due almost entirely to increased carbohydrates.
• Benefits of dietary carbohydrate restriction don’t require weight loss.
• Although weight loss isn’t required for benefit [in glycemic control], no dietary intervention is better than carbohydrate restriction for weight loss.
• Adherence to low-carbohydrate diets in people with type 2 diabetes is at least as good as adherence to any other dietary interventions and is frequently significantly better.
• Replacement of carbohydrate with protein is generally beneficial [to glycemic control].
• Dietary total and saturated fat don’t correlate with risk of cardiovascular disease.
• Plasma saturated fatty acids are controlled by dietary carbohydrate more than by dietary lipids.
• The best predictor of microvascular and, to a lesser extent, macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes is glycemic control (HbA1c).
• Dietary carbohydrate restriction is the most effective method (other than starvation) of reducing serum triglycerides and increasing high-density lipoprotein.
• Patients with type 2 diabetes on carbohydrate-restricted diets reduce and frequently eliminate medication. People with type 1 usually require lower insulin doses.
• Intensive glucose lowering by dietary carbohydrate restriction has no side effects comparable with the effects of intensive pharmacologic treatment.

http://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/0816p24.shtml

Vested Interest Disclaimer – This food pyramid is part of our Nutrition for Life message which is about eating food that is fresh, seasonal and local, and as a result, lower in highly processed foods. We encourage following Low Carbohydrate, Healthy Fat principles for people who want to take back control of their health, especially if you have Type 2 diabetes. I am the proud cofounder of the Nutrition for Life Centre and want to acknowledge that I have a vested interest in promoting the health of our community in Tasmania. The dietitians, nutritionists and diabetes educator at Nutrition for Life always work with your own health professional to make sustainable dietary changes. ‪#‎nutritionforlife‬

Continue reading

Who is qualified to give nutritional advice?


My husband, Dr. Gary Fettke No Fructose, has been silenced and so, from today, his Facebook page will become Belinda Fettke No Fructose.

There has been an AHPRA investigation into Gary’s qualifications to give nutritional advice and speak on the science of what we eat and its central role in our health. This investigation has been going on for over 2 years and a ‘caution’ has been proposed. Until the case is finalised he will have to abide by the law to maintain his professional registration, and to come back another day.

The Medical Board of Tasmania under the umbrella of the Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority have advised him, ”In particular that he does not provide specific advice or recommendations on the subject of nutrition and how it relates to the management of diabetes or the treatment and/or prevention of cancer.”

Gary is not allowed to comment on the central role of nutrition in preventative health, nor in the management of chronic illness on any social media platform.

Gary has been silenced and cannot discuss nutrition with his patients in any clinical setting, regardless of any undue stress on joints before replacement, inflammation, or even diabetes complications requiring amputation.

Gary is not allowed to speak at any public or professional meetings that involve the discussion of nutrition.

It is IMPORTANT to note: Gary has NOT BEEN CAUTIONED on what he has been advocating with regards to LCHF – Low Carbohydrate Healthy Fat living, nor in regards to lowering carbohydrate intake in diabetes management.

Gary has not been cautioned on what he has been advocating with regards to considering the health benefits of real food that is fresh, seasonal and local.

Gary has not been cautioned on what he has been advocating with regards to the central role of nutrition in health.

Gary has, however, been criticised that his interpretation of his ‘research into a topic’ is not the same as AHPRA’s.

Gary will be questioning the proposed ‘caution’ but until there is a final finding from AHPRA he will have to abide by the law and not communicate on Social Media and by inference, to his patients. That will be difficult for him as he sees the benefits every working day for his patients that adopt better eating habits.

This scenario has been similar to the case of Professor Tim Noakes in South Africa. Tim and Gary have been communicating regularly. The difference between the cases is that Gary has been judged behind closed doors and Tim’s has been in courtrooms.

Gary’s investigation was the result of an anonymous notification and throughout the process he remains unaware of the peers that are judging him. It seems a strange system, where you are guilty until proven innocent, but he hopes to have the opportunity to make representation at some time before the final judgement.

Unfortunately, at this time, AHPRA have determined that Gary, as a doctor must not continue to question the paradigm in an open forum. It won’t stop him researching though, and strengthening his knowledge base.

It concerns me that all manner of people can give advice on the internet, and by definition, I have become one of them.

I have been on this journey with Gary and have my own opinion on matters related to health. By qualification to comment, I have none. My previous work as a Registered Nurse is unlikely to give me any expertise, but, like so many people living the LCHF life, I have seen the benefits in myself and those around me for many others who have decided to Choose Health.

So, if you are interested in helping me continue to question the science, promote the role that Low Carb Healthy Fat principles play in both the management and the prevention of disease, and would like to help me be to become louder than ever before, please join me as the voice of No Fructose.

Remembering that it is now my voice, anything written/said is not to be taken as individual advice for health conditions. I would always encourage you to see your doctor or health professional to individualise treatment and lifestyle advice.

www.nofructose.com will similarly be taken over by me 🙂

My Declaration of Interest – I am the very proud Co-founder of Nutrition for Life in Tasmania. We offer face to face appointments at our clinics in both Launceston and Hobart, and regularly Skype clients in rural Tasmania and Interstate. We have the most amazing team of health professionals and support staff. and they are making a difference in people’s lives.

#wecantwait

https://www.facebook.com/thegaryscience/photos/a.407869679307489.94446.393958287365295/1089798877781229/?type=3

Nutritional ketosis is a safe state, even in pregnancy.

Piece of Red Meat on Parchment Paper

Nutritional ketosis might be where you want to go for a variety of health reasons including weight loss, sports performance, cancer management and tight control of diabetes, particularly with women diagnosed with gestational diabetes.

Lowering carbohydrate intake will mean the body looks at the alternate fuel sources of healthy fats and protein. It takes most people a couple of weeks to transition and that can be no problem or occasionally unpleasant. For me, I had no issues at all.

Ketone levels in the blood are typically 0.5 to 3.0 mmol/L. Mine normally sit there with ease.

A confusing state is often found with pregnant women running low carb in their pregnancy for a diagnosis of gestational diabetes. They might have a routine urine test showing some ketones and the nursing/medical staff panic and want to put them on insulin.

The better option is to actually measure the blood ketone levels and monitor the blood glucose. Most of these women, and their babies, are just fine and running in nutritional ketosis.

Diabetic ketoacidosis has nothing to do with the normal healthy nutritional ketosis. Those terms are often confused by people, including doctors.

Diabetic ketoacidosis is generally restricted to people with type 1 diabetes who are sick with infection or with drug related complications. Their ketone levels in the blood stream are typically at 15 – 20 mmol/L and they are very unwell. That situation is a medical emergency and needs treatment in hospital immediately.

A parent of a child with type 1 diabetes, Paul Smith, once described to me the difference between nutritional ketosis and ketoacidosis and the confusion surrounding the similar terms.

The difference between the two was the difference between being ‘skinny’ and ‘being skinned’. Sound similar but nothing at all similar.

Here’s to a healthy, normal state of nutritional ketosis for those that want to be there, and let’s stop panicking about a normal physiological state.

https://authoritynutrition.com/10-signs-and-symptoms-of-ketosis/

https://www.facebook.com/thegaryscience/posts/1086166668144450

Are there enough nutrients in grain?

“I don’t eat grains at all; no bread, no pasta, no bagels. I definitely don’t eat whole grains. Yes I said it. I. Do. Not. Eat. Whole. Grains. And I’m proud of it.”

“Grains are high in calories, low in nutrition, and they’re completely unnecessary in the human diet.”

Looks like I found someone with a similar thought process. More nutrition in red meat than grains. Check the comparison out.

Who would have thought? Hmm

Let’s sum it up. Here’s the lo-down on grains…

“Pros
They’re convenient
They’re cheap
They require minimal preparation or cooking
They taste good to most people
The food industry loves them because they can be made into just about anything and they have a long shelf life

Cons
They’re low in nutrients
They’re high in empty calories
They displace more nutrient-dense foods in the diet
There hasn’t been enough time, or selection pressure, for humans to adapt to them since their introduction into our diet
The prolamine proteins in grains (especially gluten) are difficult to break down and can be irritating to the gut.”

From Brendan Coburn, a Registered Dietitian in 2012.

http://thehealthycow.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/why-you-dont-need-grains.html

https://www.facebook.com/thegaryscience/posts/1084906674937116

Bariatric surgery patients have higher fracture rates before and after surgery.

Figure1

Obesity and osteoporosis are clearly linked – inflammation is a part of both. Add in poorer balance and that means more falls.

Bariatric surgery does not mean good nutrition and over a period of years (in this study) along comes higher fracture rates than people that did not have surgery.

I remain concerned that bariatric surgery is surgery on a ‘normal’ part of one’s anatomy. It doesn’t matter which type of procedure is being considered. It is surgery on a ‘normal’ organ.

A lot of patients can avoid this surgery by trying LCHF with good support and avoid having their ‘normal’ anatomy made ‘abnormal’. 🙁

https://www.facebook.com/thegaryscience/posts/1084939278267189

http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i3794

Misinformation taken up by the media once again. Just nonsense.

Paleo is bad, dangerous, unproven, expensive and there is no literature to support the use in Diabetes. Just nonsense.

Paleo has many definitions and the trouble is that it gets misinterpreted and misquoted. I personally do not ‘do Paleo’ but the concept of reducing processed foods ends up being Low Carb and Healthy fat. It’s about getting the energy and micronutrients right rather than focusing in on food groups.

Alas, another day of misinformation fueled by the media and I suspect, the processed food industry.

Here was my response posted on a few sites including Diabetes Australia.

“The devil is in the definition of Paleo. Dr Andrikopoulos should be defining carbohydrate intake rather than the brand ‘Paleo’.

Our very own CSIRO has shown excellent results and deprescribing with a lower carbohydrate management plan for patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Low Carb was the central topic for discussion in the Diabetes Masterclass that recently travelled Australia with Professors Gary Wittert and Grant Brinkworth advising this for first line management in Type 2.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26224300
Dr Gary Fettke”

https://www.facebook.com/paleochefpeteevans/photos/a.170871629672898.39746.169278773165517/1100752503351468/?type=3&permPage=1

https://www.facebook.com/thegaryscience/posts/1086491414778642